Skip to content

Unlimited free credit top-ups, for a limited time. Running low? Ask for more credits and we top you up, as often as you need. This offer ends soon, so catch it while it lasts.

4th on RAIDOur RAID-tuned ParaTrace v8 on the public RAID leaderboard

Was this text written by a person, or generated by AI?

Paste a text and ParaTrace tells you in seconds, marking the parts that look AI-written. Try it free, with no account needed.

  • 99.8 %

    of AI answers caught

  • 1.0 %

    of human texts wrongly flagged

  • 90

    AI models tested

Level with Pangram on AI-written essays, and like Pangram it flags none of 106 research papers written before ChatGPT. Compare with Pangram

Sign in / Sign upfor longer texts, PDFs and a history, with 100 free credits

0 words

Free checks aren't stored. To count them, the server keeps your network address in memory until midnight UTC. Privacy policy

Result

  • 99.8 %

    of AI-written answers detected

    25,601 answers · 26 developers

  • 1.0 %

    of human texts wrongly flagged

    22,681 held-out texts, same setting

  • 95.9 %

    still detected under evasion attacks

    11 attack types

  • 161 ms

    to score a 300-word text

    on our servers

How it works

From text to verdict in three steps

  1. Sign up

    Continue with Google and your account is ready at once, with 100 free credits.

  2. Submit text

    Paste text or upload one file, a PDF with selectable text or a .txt or .md file. Each text costs 1 credit per started 512 tokens, about 400 words.

  3. Read the verdict

    For each document you get the likelihood that it was AI-generated, how confident the verdict is, and any reliability warnings.

Coverage

Tested across the AI market

Detection rate on answers from the 12 developers with the most answers in our test, out of 26.

  • OpenAI99.6 %
  • Google99.8 %
  • Anthropic99.8 %
  • Meta> 99.9 %
  • Mistral99.8 %
  • Alibaba99.9 %
  • DeepSeek99.9 %
  • Reka99.9 %
  • Microsoft99.8 %
  • 01.AI99.9 %
  • Cohere99.9 %
  • xAI99.8 %
All developers, generalisation and methods

Late-2025 flagship models

  • Anthropic99.6 % of 284
  • Google100 % of 633
  • xAI99.0 % of 102
  • OpenAI98.8 % of 336

Answers were collected up to October 2025. Newer models are not yet benchmarked.

Head to head with Pangram

Within 5 points of Pangram 4 on 17 of 21 results

Pangram is one of the leading AI text detectors. We scored ParaTrace v10-ft-g on the same public tests Pangram reports on, from student essays to novels, news and reviews. It catches 100 % of fully AI-written essays, the same as Pangram, misses fewer AI texts than both Pangram versions on writing by well-known authors, and is within 5 points of Pangram 4 on 17 of the 21 results.

See all 21 results against Pangram

Within 5 points

  • Against Pangram 417 of 21 results
  • Against Pangram 318 of 21 results

Results where ParaTrace is level, ahead, or no more than 5 points behind.

Scientific papers

No false alarms on research papers written before ChatGPT

NeurIPS checked its 2026 position papers for AI-written text with Pangram, after testing it on conference papers from 2022 and 2025. We ran the same check with ParaTrace v10-ft-g. It flags none of the 106 papers from before ChatGPT, exactly like Pangram, and flags 25 of 123 papers from 2025 as at least half AI-written, 20.3 % against 1.0 % for Pangram.

See the field test on scientific papers

Papers from before ChatGPT

0of 106 papers flagged by ParaTrace, at any AI score

The same result as Pangram, which flagged 0 of 159.

Good to know

Know the limits

This is a statistical estimate, not proof. Don't use it as the sole basis for decisions about a person.

How detection works Where to be careful

  • English only. Texts in other languages are not supported.
  • At strict, 1.0 % of held-out human texts (about 1 in 100) were wrongly flagged as AI in our tests. At lenient, about 5 %. Other kinds of writing can differ.
  • Persuasive essays written by adults are a known weak spot. About 1 in 5 (20 %) is wrongly flagged at strict.
  • Texts under 50 words give less reliable verdicts. In our tests 4.1 % of short human texts were wrongly flagged.
  • Long texts are scored in overlapping chunks and labelled part by part, so a text can come out partly AI-generated. Where the AI part starts and ends is approximate.

Questions

Questions and answers

Didn't find yours? Ask us

Is the AI checker free?

Yes. You can check a few texts a day right on this page, with no account. A free account starts with 100 credits and takes longer texts and files. Each text costs 1 credit per started 512 tokens, about 400 words.

How accurate is ParaTrace?

In our latest benchmark it caught 99.8 % of 25,601 AI-written answers from 90 models, and wrongly flagged 1.0 % of 22,681 held-out human texts. The benchmark report has every result.

Which AI models does it detect?

We tested answers from 90 models by 26 developers, among them the late-2025 flagship models of Anthropic, Google, OpenAI and xAI. Answers were collected up to October 2025, and newer models are not yet benchmarked.

Does a verdict prove that a text was written by AI?

No. This is a statistical estimate, not proof. Don't use it as the sole basis for decisions about a person.

Which languages and files can I check?

English texts only. You can paste a text, or sign in and upload one file, a PDF with selectable text or a .txt or .md file.

What happens to the texts I check?

Free checks without an account aren't stored. Texts you check signed in are stored in your history until you delete them. Don't submit confidential or personal data. The privacy policy has the details.

Can I use ParaTrace from my own software?

Yes. The ParaTrace API checks texts from your own software, and a free key comes with 1,000 credits. To run the detector in your own cloud, see the Enterprise edition.

Check your first text now

Free, in seconds, with no account needed.

Check a text for free